06 Sep The Overqualification Dilemma

Just a bit of a rant:

Over the past few years of my job search, I’ve been labeled “overqualified” more times than I can count. I suspect ageism might also be at play. I’ve applied for roles I was genuinely excited about, only to hear the familiar line: they’re moving forward with other candidates whose experiences ‘more closely match the role requirements’—which feels ridiculous when my skills align perfectly, but my extensive 14-year background in leadership and management is seen as a disqualifier.

As someone who has hired many overqualified and older employees, I’ve seen it all: some leave quickly or get bored, but others become some of the best assets a company could hope for. They grow, they build, and they stay committed—even after I’ve moved on or been laid off.

We don’t know everyone’s reason for applying to a role they’re “overqualified” for. Some people want a change of pace (like me). Some are recovering from burnout (also me). Others are looking to transition into new industries (yep, me again). And sometimes, people just need a damn job. But in interviews, we have to dance around the truth, crafting stories to justify our interest in positions below our experience level. Maybe that person has applied to hundreds of jobs. Maybe they have a family to support.

While I’m still searching for the right role, I’ve found solace in consulting and gig work. In the coming months, I’ll be hiring, and I commit to never dismissing someone because they lack experience or are “overqualified.” I’ll respond to every applicant and provide honest feedback to everyone we interview.

I know how it feels. We have to do better, folks.